Author: Cozmin Gușă
Edi Hellvig, the former head of Romania’s Intelligence Service (SRI), whom I’ve been saying for the past 25 years is supposedly a friend of mine, ordered yesterday the intel-agent journalists he coordinates to publish pseudo-analyses in which I’m once again labeled as a “Putinist,” “Russophile,” and now the attack is extended to my son, the young MP Andrei Gușă, in an attempt to cause him trouble at the start of his career and new political activity in AUR. Of course, these attacks followed my analysis from yesterday where I presented the Kondor Zoltan network, in which Hellvig plays an important role. I won’t name the intelligence-linked journalists because they’re not worth it, and I won’t hit back at Hellvig because he’s apparently going through a tough time in his life; I’ll just bitterly joke and paraphrase Elena Ceaușescu by saying: “Let his fellow spooks judge him for his deeds.”
Today I note that, for about two weeks now, the rhetoric from three years ago has returned — the rhetoric from the beginning of the Ukrainian war, when absolutely any opinion that didn’t align with the officially sanctioned propaganda of the Collective West was labeled as “Russophile,” and the person expressing it was deemed a Putinist. If you said that Zelensky and his people would lose the war, it was unacceptable. If you warned that the EU was heading into economic crisis due to the war effort and the loss of cheap energy, you were sanctioned. If you wrote that Ukraine was conducting false-flag operations with boomerang effects, you were crucified. If you demonstrated that the war’s outcome would be the consolidation of the Moscow-Beijing axis and the decline of the West, no storm could wash away the insults hurled at you. And I could go on. Well, together with my colleagues from the GOLD Think Tank, we argued all these points, back then, three years ago; we even published two volumes of analysis titled “The War in Ukraine,” and all of us, without exception, were later labeled “Putinists” or “Russophiles,” were targeted by media smear campaigns, and some of us were placed on the death list of the Ukrainian website Myrotvorets, and no one from the Romanian state defended us, on the contrary. But life, the results, and the consequences of the war, even the official American rhetoric after Biden’s departure, have proven that we were right, that the crisis the West is in today, including Romania, is the result of this war, a war whose peace terms could have been negotiated and signed as early as April 2022, but the Western power regimes, under the tutelage of high international finance, prevented it.
As I was saying, in the past few weeks this idiotic rhetoric about the “necessary war” with Russia has been revived, relaunched on the Paris–Berlin axis by puppet leaders like Macron or Merz, and most aggressively supported in the region by states like Moldova, which is on life support and barely breathing, or like Romania, also on the edge of an economic abyss, currently led by a head of state who has become a planetary laughingstock — he may well be the most ridiculous head of state on the current geopolitical scene. Globally, the situation is heavily imbalanced in favor of the BRICS+ power axis — Russia and China — with Trump’s America having smartly stepped sideways toward neutrality, and the EU geopolitically isolated, at a clear military disadvantage compared to Russia, and struggling with current economic woes that could realistically take five to eight years to fix — and that’s if the EU started reforms today, which it clearly is not doing. So against this backdrop, how else could I see the caricature-like image from Chișinău — with Nicușor and Maia, a sort of Laurel and Hardy, declaring war on Russia and then today going hand-in-hand to Odessa to accompany that other comic-tragic leader, Zelensky, from where the three want to scare Putin? And I’m horrified because, after Ukraine’s attack on the Russian nuclear triad, it’s clear the war will escalate and radicalize, and under these conditions, Romania’s chances of being protected from Russian army attacks, as we’ve luckily been until now, are rapidly diminishing. And the useful idiots — clearly also traitors — who hold influence at the top of the Romanian state believe that if they label us pacifists as “Putinists” or “Russophiles,” they’ll solve their problems in front of their bosses, easily assimilated to international economic hitmen. With this attitude of theirs, soon they’ll be ordered to carry out even more provocative actions against Russia, with nearly fatal consequences, and then you’ll see our so-called Romanian “leaders” tripping over each other trying to turn back — only it will be too late. Romania will already be caught in the tangled web of an expanded war, playing the suicidal proxy role, following the tragic model of our Ukrainian neighbors.
